Toggle Menu
Greater Diversity News Homepage
  • Latest Jobs
    • Search Jobs
    • Send Advertisements/Jobs
    • Weekly PDF Editions
  • Books of Knowledge
    • Latest Books
    • Get Started: Reading Order
    • Books of Knowledge Newsletter Archives
  • A Call to Colors
    • A Call to Colors Articles
    • About Civic Engagement Project
    • Civic Engagement Headlines
    • The Network for 2018
    • GDN eNews Archives
  • Economic Equity
    • Economic Equity Headlines
    • About Economic Equity
    • GDN eNews Archives
  • Post/View Events
    • View Events
    • Month View
    • Post Events
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe to eNews
    • Subscribe to Print
  • Sections/Archives
    • Latest Headlines
    • GDN eNews Archives
    • Books of Knowledge
    • Civic Engagement Headlines
    • Economic Equity Headlines
    • NAACP News
    • Weekly PDF Editions
      • Print PDF Archives
    • All GDN Posts
  • Contact Us
    • General Questions
    • Send Advertisements
    • Contact GDN Sales
    • About GDN Products
    • Advertise
NCDOT

Voting rights become a proxy war in the 2016 presidential election

by GDN Shared Post August 4, 2016
Who gets to vote? Democrats and Republicans clash over the answer. Steve Cukrov/SHUTTERSTOCK

Who gets to vote? Democrats and Republicans clash over the answer. Steve Cukrov/SHUTTERSTOCK

Voting rights:

Republicans – with a helping nudge from the United States Supreme Court’s conservative majority (of which more below) – are passing restrictive voting rights laws in states where they control both branches of government.

Meanwhile, Democrats are expanding voting rights in states where they dominate the governing process. Democrats Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Representative John Lewis of Georgia also introduced a billin Congress at the end of June that would require states (mostly in the South) to get federal approval for any changes in any statewide voting laws or procedures.

This battle is especially important for a presidential election year, when voter turnout is significantly higher than in midterm elections.

Much of the difference in the turnout is made up of prime Democratic constituencies – the young and minorities – which explains why Democrats are so set on increasing turnout and Republicans would prefer to restrict it.

Under the banner of preventing ”voter fraud,” GOP lawmakers are making it harder for people to register to vote by requiring photo-ID documents and by limiting early and weekend voting, which is more frequently used by those who find it hard to get to the polls on a Tuesday.

In many inner cities, for example, black churches have run “souls to the polls” caravans on the Sunday before election day.

Republicans in Maine went so far as to repeal their long-standing Election Day Registration law (EDR); however voters reinstated it in 2011 when Democrats managed to place the issue on a referendum ballot.

On the other side of the aisle, Democrats have successfully extended Election Day registration in the blue states of Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, California and Rhode Island, bringing the number of EDR states to 13 plus the District of Columbia.

GOP cites ‘rampant voter fraud’

Republicans cite rampant voter fraud as the basis for more restrictive voting laws. However, there is scant empirical evidence for such claims.

The risk of prosecution for perjury is a strong disincentive for an ineligible voter to impersonate someone else in order to cast a single ballot. While voter fraud does exist, it is usually committed by election officials who would be unaffected by photo ID laws.

Despite this, Republican lawmakers keep pushing such regulations, which Democrats contend have the greatest impact on segments of the population – racial minorities and young people – who tend to vote Democratic and are less likely to have driver licenses or other acceptable forms of ID.

Republicans want to clamp down, Democrats want to open up corund/Shutterstock

Tightening laws in the red states

Since the 2010 election, 21 Republican-controlled states have enactedlaws making it more difficult to register or vote. Among the most draconian of these laws are:

North Carolina: The Voter Information and Verification Act mandates strict identification to cast a vote, and disallows the use of student or public employee IDs. It also cut back early voting days by a week. One study found that 55% of North Carolina Democrats lacked an appropriate state-issued ID.

Ohio: The legislature sharply curtailed early voting, including voting on the Sunday before an election, when historically African-American churches rallied their congregants to go to the polls. It also eliminated Golden Week when citizens could both register and vote on the same day.

Florida: The state is arguably the leader in implementing voting restrictions. It was one of the first states to cut back on early voting, suppress voter registration drives and cut off voting rights for those with former criminal convictions. Some 1.5 million Floridians with criminal convictions are essentially permanently disenfranchised.

Texas: The state’s voter ID law is probably the strictest in the country. It allows only a few forms of photo identification, and does not allow student IDs or tribal IDs, although gun permits are acceptable. The law was initially struck down by a federal court, but the US Supreme Court allowed it to go into effect for the 2014 election.

Georgia: The Peach State has one of the most restricting photo ID laws. It does not recognize student ID cards from private colleges or government benefit cards.

Kansas: The Secure and Fair Elections Act of 2011 requires the following in order to vote: (1) show a photo ID at the polling place; (2) voters requesting a mail-in ballot must submit their driver’s license number or a copy of a photo ID; and (3) provide proof of US citizenship.

Pennsylvania: In 2012, the legislature passed a law requiring voters to bring a photo ID to the polls. But in 2014, the Commonwealth Court struck down the law, finding it in violation of the State Constitution. The court found that “hundreds of thousands of registered voters lacked the restrictive forms of ID required.“ And the state had not made it easy to get an ID. The court also found there was no evidence of in-person voter fraud. The state declined to appeal.

More restrictive voting laws were also adopted in the following states: Arkansas (photo ID required to vote – Legislature overrode gubernatorial veto; Indiana (authorized challengers can demand proof of identification); Nebraska (reduced early voting period); North Dakota (required photo ID to vote); Tennessee (more restrictive photo ID requirement); Virginia (required photo ID and restricted third-party voter registration).

Legislative battles continue to rage in many other states over Republican-backed voting restrictions, and court fights continue over many of those already in place.

However, the conservative Supreme Court majority has provided support for many of these laws, first by upholding the Indiana photo ID law a decade ago and then by striking down Section 5 of the Federal Voting Rights Act, which required states with a history of racial discrimination in voting to get pre-clearance for new restrictive voting laws from either a federal court or the US Department of Justice.

Blue states expand voting rights

Meanwhile, blue states have been moving sharply in an opposite direction to expand the right to vote. At the same time, Democrats arechallenging voter rights restrictions imposed by Republicans.

A number of states have adopted on-line voting registration, making it easier for eligible voters to get on the rolls in states like Illinois, Virginia and West Virginia. And Maryland expanded early voting and allowed same-day registration during early voting.

But most significantly, Oregon adopted universal registration of anyone over 18 who does not opt out. This position now seems to be supported by Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democrats’ likely presidential candidate, and will no doubt be endorsed by other Democratic politicians.

The general counsel for Clinton’s presidential campaign, Marc Elias, has been leading the charge in filing challenges to voting rules in the key battleground states of Virginia, Ohio and Wisconsin.

The success of those challenges – or the continued ability of Republican legislators to impose voting restrictions – would markedly change the US electorate in the decades to come.

Author

Frank Askin

Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of the Constitutional Rights Clinic at Rutgers School of Law, , Rutgers University Newark

Disclosure statement

Frank Askin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.

Partners

Rutgers University Newark

Rutgers University Newarkprovides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation US.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related Civic Engagement Headlines Articles

Similar Posts From Civic Engagement Headlines Category
Play Ball, To the Victor Goes You – Power and the Righteous

Play Ball, To the Victor Goes You – Power and the Righteous

April 15, 2019
NAACP Pledge Protect and Preserve Our Lives – Stop Police Violence

NAACP Pledge Protect and Preserve Our Lives – Stop Police Violence

July 25, 2016
Why We Need More Black Men in Early Childhood Education

Why We Need More Black Men in Early Childhood Education

November 28, 2017

voter registration

Latest Jobs & Bids

Click here to send us your ad and get more information about advertising, or call Kathy Grear at 800-462-0738, cell: 910-617-4542.

  1. Bar Construction Co., Inc.

    City of Winston Salem – Hobby Park Phase 1 Improvements

  2. Haynes Heating & Cooling and Haynes Electric Divisions of M. B. Haynes Corp.

    WCU -Baseball Lot (8A) Parking Deck, Cullowhee, NC

  3. North Carolina Department of Public Safety

    Buncombe County C-11263 Install New Roof Drain

  4. North Carolina A&T State University

    Irwin Belk Track Resurfacing Project

  5. Lomax Construction, Inc.

    UNC Carrington Hall Classroom Upgrades, Chapel Hill, NC

  6. H&M Constructors and Haynes Electric Construction

    WCU Baseball Lot Parking Deck, Cullowhee, North Carolina

  7. I.L. Long Construction Co., Inc.

    UNC Charlotte IT Infrastructure Upgrades” Project

  8. Baker Mechanical, Inc.

    Seeking Minority Prices for work relating to HVAC

  9. Cooper Construction Company

    Gorges State Park – New Campground Development 

  10. Wilkie Construction Company

    Bid Invitation for Renovations to Fairgrove Life Houses – City of Hickory

  11. North Carolina Department of Public Safety

    C-C11280 Tarheel Challenge Fire Alarm System

  12. Johnston County Schools

    New Entrance for North Johnston High School

  13. Eastern Pines Water Corporation

    Pitt County Bridge No. 5 Water Main Relocation

  14. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Carrington Hall Classrooms Renovations

  15. Southeastern Community College

    Educational Talent Search Counselor EMS Lead Instructor Electrical Engineering Technology Instructor (Part-time)

  16. Pitt County Schools

    AG COX Middle School Additions and Renovations for Pitt County Schools

  17. Orange Water and Sewer Authority

    Biosolids Recycling Supervisor

  18. Edifice, Inc.

    Centre South – Building C project

  19. Thalle Construction Company

    NCDOT C204378 – Sampson County, NC-24 from US421/704 and SR1296 to East of SR-1935

  20. City of Statesville

    Police Department Assistant Police Chief, Crime Analyst, Garage Division Automotive Mechanic

  21. Smith-Rowe, LLC

    Contract ID DK00280,County Yadkin, Description Replace Bridge #20 on SR1152 (Neelie Road) Over South Deep Creek 

  22. County of Wake

    Procter Farm Preserve, located in Wendell, NC

  23. UNC Hospitals

    Medical Surgical Vacuum System Upgrades project at UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC

  24. Bar Construction Co., Inc.

    City of Greensboro POD Breakroom Renovations

  25. Bar Construction Co., Inc.

    Wendell Elementary School Elevator Modernization

  26. Bar Construction Co., Inc.

    High Point Parking Deck Lighting Replacement

  27. Bar Construction Co., Inc.

    City of Greensboro POD Breakroom Renovations

  28. Bar Construction Co., Inc.

    Rocky Mount Police Department and Judicial Building Elevator Modernization

  29. Bar Construction Co., Inc.

    Rocky Mount City Hall and Atrium Elevator Modernization

  30. NHM Constructors, LLC

    NCDOT Contract DK00280 Yadkin County

  31. Orange Water and Sewer Authority

    Utility Mechanic III

  32. Edifice, Inc.

    Centre South – Building C project

  33. Wilkie Construction Co.

    Panhellenic Hall Elevator Modernization,Schaefer Center for Performing Arts:  Female Toilet Renovation

  34. New Hanover County Schools

    Closed-circuit cooling tower addition at the Emsley A. Laney High School campus

  35. City of Sanford

    Project Forge Sewer Extension

  36. Young McQueen Grading

    Gorges State Park – New Campground Development

  37. Town of Burnsville

    Meadow Road and Indian Trail Sewer System Improvements

  38. Town of Holden Beach

    Modifications to the Town of Holden Beach’s Vacuum Pump Station No. 3

  39. Barnhill Contracting Company

    December 17th, 2019 Southeast Division Contract ID C204378/Sampson. . . . . . …

  40. UNC Hospitals

    UNCH SPEC/CT project at the UNCH Children’s Hospital, Chapel Hill


Greater Diversity News Print Edition
voter registration

tetsaro

tetsaro
Banner
  • Refund Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Job Posting
  • GDN eNews Subscription for Economic Equity Updates

Designed by Intimiste Creative Group

© 2017 Copyright Greater Diversity News. All Rights reserved.

  Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading