Toggle Menu
Greater Diversity News Homepage
  • Latest Jobs
    • Search Jobs
    • Send Advertisements/Jobs
    • Weekly PDF Editions
    • Subscribe to Print Edition
  • Books of Knowledge
    • Latest Books
    • Get Started: Reading Order
  • A Call to Colors
    • A Call to Colors Articles
    • About Civic Engagement Project
    • Civic Engagement Headlines
    • The Network for 2018
    • About Economic Equity
    • Economic Equity Headlines
    • GDN eNews Archives
  • Student Engagement
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe to Print
    • Subscribe to eNews
    • eNews Archives
  • Virtual Events
  • Eastern NC
  • Sections/Archives
    • Latest Headlines
    • GDN eNews Archives
    • Books of Knowledge
    • Civic Engagement Headlines
    • Economic Equity Headlines
    • NAACP News
    • Print PDF Archives
    • All GDN Posts
  • Contact Us
    • General Questions
    • Send Advertisements
    • Contact GDN Sales
    • About GDN Products
    • Advertise
ACTC ACTC
Money, Politics and Justice Anthony Kennedy: Revisiting Citizens United

Money, Politics and Justice Anthony Kennedy: Revisiting Citizens United

by Michael T. Morley Assistant Professor of Law, Florida State University July 25, 2018

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is one of retiring U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s most maligned rulings. Many condemn the opinion for treating corporations as people, money as speech, and elections as commodities to be sold to the highest bidder.

President Barack Obama lambasted Citizens United in a State of the Union address. During her 2016 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton promised to nominate a Supreme Court justice who would overturn it.

Citizens United does not deserve such scorn.

As an election law scholar who has litigated campaign finance cases, including in the U.S. Supreme Court, I believe Citizens United is a straightforward application of free speech principles and, like Kennedy’s jurisprudence as a whole, reflects a balance of conservative and liberal legal conclusions.

The history

Citizens United was a non-profit corporation that received “a small portion of its funds” from for-profit corporations.

David Bossie, leader of Citizens United and producer of ‘Hillary: The Movie’ AP Photo/Evan Vucci

In 2008, while Hillary Clinton was seeking the Democratic Party’s nomination for President, it released a documentary called Hillary: The Movie. The film featured numerous interviews with people who, the Supreme Court explained, were “quite critical” of her.

Citizens United wanted to pay a cable company $1.2 million to make the documentary available for free, on demand, to the company’s subscribers. It also wished to air paid advertisements for the movie.

Federal law, however, prohibited corporations from spending money to expressly advocate a federal candidate’s election or defeat. This restriction applied to Hillary: The Movie because Citizens United had accepted some corporate funding and the film amounted to express advocacy.

Citizens United sued, arguing these restrictions violated its First Amendment rights.

The ruling

Kennedy’s opinion in Citizens United blended conservative concern for free speech with a more liberal focus on transparency.

The conservative majority held corporations have the right to create and distribute political advertisements and other election-related communications such as Hillary: The Movie.

All the justices except Clarence Thomas joined in the final part of the opinion, which held that the government may require speakers like Citizens United to publicly report such expenditures and include disclaimers on their election-related communications, revealing who paid for them.

Justice Anthony Kennedy in 2010. AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

Citizens United ended unnecessary restraints on political expression and gave voters access to a wider range of election-related information. It also afforded corporations a fair chance to present their perspective on elections that could have tremendous consequences for them.

Corporations are taxed and subject to government regulation. They play vital roles in providing the jobs, goods and services that drive our economy. It is only fair to allow corporations to voice their institutional views about candidates for public office — views that voters, of course, are free to completely disregard.

Money, speech and collective political action

Critics claim Citizens United allowed corporate America to buy elections.

The central question in the case, however, was whether corporations could spend money to engage in election-related speech. It remains illegal for corporations to contribute money to candidates, political parties or traditional political action committees (PACs).

Moreover, most of the principles Citizens United relied upon were established in cases decided decades earlier.

The 1976 landmark case Buckley v. Valeo set forth the constitutional principles governing modern campaign finance law. It reaffirmed that election-related speech lies at the heart of the First Amendment. And it recognized that, while money is not literally speech, it is essential to virtually every form of political speech.

Political signs require poster board and markers. Political flyers must be duplicated. Political advertisements cost money to broadcast or publish.

Limiting political spending, the Supreme Court explained, reduces “the number of issues discussed, the depth of their exploration, and the size of the audience reached.” The government may not limit political expression, the court emphasized, just because it costs money. Rather, such “independent expenditures” remain pure political speech entitled to maximum constitutional protection.

In the decades after Buckley, the Supreme Court held that people retain this right to engage in pure election-related expression when they join together to achieve political goals collectively. Groups such as political action committees, political parties and certain non-profit corporations have the First Amendment right to spend money to fund election-related speech without government limits. Several liberal justices joined in many of these rulings.

Citizens United extended to for-profit corporations the same constitutional right to advocate for or against candidates that other types of private associations – as well as the corporations’ stockholders, directors, executives and employees – already possessed.

A trickle, not a flood

Critics proclaimed that Citizens United would open the floodgates to a deluge of corporate political spending.

They were wrong.

University of New Mexico Professor Wendy Hansen and her co-authors discovered that, in the 2012 election, “not a single Fortune 500+ company” made independent expenditures. And only nine Fortune 500 companies made contributions to SuperPACs, totaling less than $5 million.

This trend persisted in ensuing elections. The Conference Board’s Committee for Economic Development reports that only 10 corporations made independent expenditures in 2016, and they totaled less than $700,000.

Such results are unsurprising. Most major corporations do not want to alienate up to half their potential customers by spending millions of dollars publicly aligning themselves with a particular candidate or political party.

What about SuperPACs?

A more substantial objection is that Citizens United paved the way for “SuperPACs.”

SuperPACs are political committees that only fund election-related speech and activities without input from candidates. Because SuperPACs cannot contribute to candidates or political parties, people may give unlimited amounts of money to them.

Citizens United didn’t create the principles that led to SuperPACs; Buckley did. SuperPACs simply let people join together to engage in the same political speech and spending they were already free, under Buckley, to perform on their own.

Kennedy’s opinion in Citizens United did not cause a corporate Armageddon for our political system. It was a victory for the fundamental First Amendment right of all Americans, individually or collectively through corporations, to engage in pure political speech about federal elections.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related Civic Engagement Headlines Articles

Similar Posts From Civic Engagement Headlines Category
‘A Red Line Crossed’: Nationwide Protests Declared for Thursday at 5PM After Jeff Sessions Fired

‘A Red Line Crossed’: Nationwide Protests Declared for Thursday at 5PM After Jeff Sessions Fired

November 8, 2018
This Is Why Migrant Parents Travel with Children

This Is Why Migrant Parents Travel with Children

July 25, 2018
Detroit NAACP Slams Michigan Republicans for Trying to Limit Democrats’ Power

Detroit NAACP Slams Michigan Republicans for Trying to Limit Democrats’ Power

December 10, 2018


Greater Diversity News Print Edition

Latest Jobs & Bids

Click here to send us your ad and get more information about advertising, or call Kathy Grear at 800-462-0738, cell: 910-617-4542.

  1. North Carolina Department of Public Safety

    Granville County out for bid: C11389 Polk Storm Drain Repair

  2. Barnhill Contracting Company /DA Everett , A Joint Venture

    NCCU New School of Business project

  3. Sampson Community College

    Sampson Community College Transportation Annex Classroom Building File #19-20081-01b: NCCCS #2436 EDA Investment No. 04-01-07418

  4. Southeastern Community College

    Child Development Center Teacher (Part Time) EMS Lead Instructor Information Systems Specialist

  5. City of Statesville, NC

    Public Utilities Department Water Resources Division: Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade C (Night Shift)

  6. Yates Construction Co. Inc.

    Town of Kernersville Kerners Mill Creek Greenway

  7. Nash County Public Schools

    “New Facility for Replacement Elementary School”

  8. North Carolina National Guard

    McLeansville Regional Readiness Center

  9. Monteith Construction

    Durham Fire Station & EMS No. 18 (Spanish Version)

  10. Monteith Construction

    Durham Fire & EMS Station No. 18 project

  11. Franklin County Schools

    Professional Design Services for a feasibility study for a possible Franklinton Elementary School Replacement Project

  12. The Christman Company

    Alamance Community College – Biotechnology Center in Graham, NC

  13. The Christman Company

    Sandhills Community College – Kennedy Hall Renovation & Addition in Pinehurst, NC

  14. Barnhill Contracting Company

    NCDOT Contract: #DA00494 Currituck County – Shoreline Stabilization Along Knotts Island Causeway

  15. Barnhill Contracting Company

    NCDOT Contract:  #DA00490 Tyrrell & Washington County – Guardrail Replacement, Milling & Resurfacing of US 64 in Tyrrell & Washington County

  16. UNC Greensboro

    UNCG Walker Avenue Parking Deck – Girder Repairs project (NCSCO ID # 17-16775-01B)

  17. Beco, Inc.

    GTCC Auto Body Building Generator Power

  18. City of Lumberton

    Airport Manager

  19. Terry’s Plumbing and Utilities, Inc.

    Demolition Hurricane Florence Project- Moore County, NC

  20. H&M Constructors

    Macon County Middle School Renovations Franklin, North Carolina

  21. Edifice, LLC

    CMS Lansdowne Elementary School in Charlotte, NC

  22. NC Dept. of Natural & Cultural Resources

    The Eno River State Park Visitor Contact Station and Maintenance Building

  23. NC Department of Transportation  

    South Ferry Landing Building Repairs project

  24. NC Wildlife Resources Commission

    Wildlife Resources Commission Bolivia Depot – Office & Storage Building SCO # 19-20580-01A

  25. Buchanan and Sons, Inc.

    French Broad River Greenway West Project (City Project Name: 298-U-5019B-FBRGW) located in Buncombe County, NC

  26. Barnhill Contracting/Holt Brothers a Design Build Joint Venture

    Wilson Academy of Applied Technology project in Wilson, NC

  27. NC Department of Transportation

    (C204593) Perquimans; (C204434) Craven; (C204449) Pender, Duplin; C204535) Duplin; (C204534) Duplin; (C204489) Halifax;

  28. North Carolina Department of Public Safety

    Wake County: ABC Commission Warehouse Rack Additions

  29. North Carolina Department of Public Safety

    Warren County: C-C11386 Warren CI Chiller Replacement

  30. Smith-Rowe, LLC

    Harnett County, Bridge No. 151 Over Hectors Creek Grading, Drainage, Paving and Structure; Robeson County, Bridge 239 Over Burnt Swamp Widening, Grading, Paving, Drainage & Structure

  31. Richmond Community College

    Cafe– Restaurant Assistant Manager Mathematics Instructor Financial Aid Specialist, Enrollment Management Coordinator

  32. Baker Mechanical, Inc.

    Seeking Minority Prices for work relating to HVAC

  33. North Carolina Department of Public Safety

    Bladen County out for bid: C Elizabethtown LED Project

  34. North Carolina Department of Public Safety

    Hyde County out for bid: C11371 Water Tower Restoration

  35. A. R. Chesson Construction

    Manns Harbor Shipyard Main Building HVAC

  36. NHM Constructors, LLC

    02/03/21:  DM00287 Rutherford – Replace Bridge 167 (SR-1007 Andrew Mills Rd over Roberson Creek)

  37. North Carolina Department of Transportation

    Design-Build Request For Qualifications (RFQ) Design-Build Teams submit qualifications for an Express Design-Build Project. This project is located in Division 11 and includes the replacement of three structures

  38. Haren Construction Company, Inc.

    Monroe, NC – SP105 Crooked Creek WRF Process Impvs. Project

  39. East Carolina University

    “College Hill Drive Steam Replacement Phase 2” Project, SCO ID# 20-21927-01A, ECU # AiM CP 1692, DEI # 50132381

  40. Clancy & Theys Construction Company

    Sampson County Public Safety Center

  41. Bar Construction Co., Inc.

    Orange County Facilities Renovations in Hillsborough, NC

  42. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission

    Rhodes Pond Dam Repair (SCO #13-10039-02B)

  43. Montgomery County

    Little River Water Line Crossing at Pekin Rd.

  44. Lomax Construction, Inc.

    Cameron Park Elementary School, Hillsborough, NC

  45. Barnhill Contracting

    New Construction of the Sampson County 911 & E.S. Facilities located in Clinton, NC

  46. Barnhill Contracting Company

    NCDOT Milling & Resurfacing on US 264, WBS 2021CPT.02.16.10741 (DB00498), Pitt County, NC

  47. Barnhill Contracting Company

    NCDOT Milling & Resurfacing on Various Primary and Secondary Routes, WBS 2021CPT.04.13.10421, 2021CPT.04.13.20421 (DD00341), Halifax County, NC

  48. Smith-Rowe, LLC

    Forsyth County Kerners Mill Creek Greenway

  49. Housing Authority of the City of Wilmington North Carolina

    Houston Moore Renovations / Rehabilitation Lifespan Extension

  50. Wake County Public School System

    Wake Forest High School Stadium Renovation

  51. H.M. Kern Corporation

    NCDPS Albemarle Correctional Accessible Cells project

  52. H.M. Kern Corporation

    NC A&T Fume Hood Replacements project

  53. H.M. Kern Corporation

    Orange County Facilities Renovations project

  54. H.M. Kern Corporation

    Randolph County Clerk of Court Office Renovations project

  55. Haren Construction Company, Inc.

    Lawndale, NC – Cleveland Co. Water WTP Clearwell, High Service Pump Station, and Water Line Project

  56. Sandhills Community College

    Sandhills Community College Kennedy Hall Renovation & Addition (SCO # 19-20074-02A)

  57. Thomas Construction Group

    Sampson County 911 & ES Facilities project in Clinton, NC

  58. Gaston County

    Gaston County Finance Office and Tax Mapping Renovations and Tax Mapping Renovations

  59. Sharpe Brothers

    North Carolina Department of Administration (HUB) or the NCDOT within North Central North Carolina Counties for the City of Greensboro – Summit Avenue Streetscape project

  60. New Atlantic Contracting, Inc.

    Sampson County 911 and Emergency Services Facilities


tetsaro
actc video
Banner

  • Refund Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Job Posting
  • GDN eNews Subscription for Economic Equity Updates

Designed by Raibach Inc.

© 2017 Copyright Greater Diversity News. All Rights reserved.

  Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading
SUBSCRIBE
Processing...
Thank you! Your subscription has been confirmed. You'll hear from us soon.
Subscribe to Get Updates and the Latest Headlines
Email updates sent weekly on Voter Engagement, Economic Equity, and weekly Job Postings.
ErrorHere
Powered By Campaign Monitor